Dublin had a narrow escape. The government must not yet increase corporate taxes in exchange for help in its banking sector.
Ireland may blow: the EU and the IMF should not insist that it no longer sacrosanct corporate tax of 12.5%. The Irish Government however intends to broaden its base in exchange for financial support for its banking sector.
It must be said that the corporation tax (IS), the lowest in the euro area where the average is 25.7%, was the main driver of the spectacular growth experienced by Ireland in the years 1980 and 1990. It is as English-speaking countries with low taxation that the island has managed to attract big names in high tech and pharmaceuticals such as Merck, Microsoft and Google. U.S. companies are in fact 100 000 jobs in Ireland.Even in this year of recession, companies that export high-tech products have created 7000 starch.
Foreign companies threaten to leave
Ireland is therefore concerned that an increase in the SI do flee, and foreign companies do nothing to reassure her. Microsoft, Intel, Hewlett Packard as well as Bank of America and Merrill Lynch indicated in a statement by the American Chamber of Commerce that an increase in the SI in Ireland would have an "adverse impact" on its "ability to attract and retain investments. " And discuss other countries, like Singapore, considered to be more competitive cool business card… Without going so far, other countries such as Iceland, Holland and Switzerland also offers tax advantages for businesses.
That is why Dublin is ready to undergo many sacrifices its citizens for not having to touch the SI: the minimum wage should be lowered taxes on the increased income and wages of employees declined further.
The opportunity for better tax harmonization?
However, the EU and the IMF could, as had been discussed in recent days to push harder on that Dublin is revising its rates upward. Germany and France have often expressed grievances vis-à-vis the distortion of competition engendered by the tax system "unfair" Irish. Business Insider blog compares the lenient attitude of Britain to that of a "cuckold husband who not only forgive but would leave his wife continue to deceive."But in fact "is not so much that French companies relocating their operations and jobs in Ireland, says Agnès Benassy Quéré, CEPII economist, it is mostly they are making arrangements for tax optimization through their subsidiary Irish and thus deprive the French state tax revenue. "
Yet at a time when all states are desperate for revenue, there may therefore be a "window of opportunity for more tax harmonization could, for example through a floor," said economist CEPII. Moreover, Ireland itself is beginning to experience the bitter taste of tax competition. "While the UK has temporarily lowered its tax last year, the people of Dublin have begun to do their shopping in Belfast."
In addition, an increase of the SI would not necessarily be so bad for Ireland.For despite the thinly veiled threats of foreign firms, it does not say that they really deserted island. After all, the country has more to offer than its low IS: it represents, including the U.S., access to the single European market where the workforce speaks English, is well formed and costs little in payroll taxes. Although the SI progressed, companies would not go necessarily in the British neighbor, where the government has promised to raise the SI from 28 to 24% but they would face the exchange risk to the pound sterling.
However, it is not clear that increasing the SI has little effect. From an Irish perspective, first, "the SI is not the best lever to raise funds because in essence it is a bit predictable tax whose revenues vary greatly depending on the losses or profits groups "said Agnes Benassy Quéré.The Irish also have beautiful game to point out that more than IS does not necessarily mean more tax revenue. Despite their higher rates, countries such as Germany (30%) and France (33%) eventually reap little revenue because of the many ways to circumvent taxation professional business card. A recent study by the Council of compulsory shows that this rate is moot, especially for large groups, in fact, rather pay around 8%. Result, the IS represents 2.7% of GDP in Ireland against only 1.9% in Germany and 2.9% in France, according to the OECD.
From the perspective of the other major European countries, it does not saying that the Irish tax competition is so dangerous as this: first, because "public spending are not all unproductive and that some of them Fortunately, help increase business productivity, "says Thierry Madiès site Telos.Then, because the 'big' countries can sustain higher tax rates than small "countries because they are less susceptible to leakage of tax base."
Finally, Ireland impose a rate increase could be turned against Germany and France when they try to pass an amendment to the EU treaty, warns C. Randall Henning the Peterson Institute. Indeed, if Ireland finally ratified the Treaty of Lisbon, was on the express condition that it could retain its IS. If this guarantee is not met, the Irish, great regulars "no" in referendums in Europe, will have even more reasons to oppose a new treaty.